nanog mailing list archives
Re: sfps from fs dot com
From: Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog () lixfeld ca>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:58:36 -0400
On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net> wrote: In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see --, but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the price, it can be a "successful" business model.
For someone who doesn't want to deal with outages, call-volume, hands tickets, truck-rolls, and has money to burn, there are better alternatives.
Indeed. My tune would be very different if we had 1:50 fail in the field.
Current thread:
- sfps from fs dot com Nicholas Warren (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Dennis Lundström (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Matthew Crocker (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Carl Peterson (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Nikolas Geyer (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Michel Py (Sep 20)