nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mx204 alternative
From: Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 04:52:38 -0400
On 9/2/19 4:49 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
That said, in the Metro, we don't generally support LAG's toward customers because getting policing to work reliably on them is difficult. So we wouldn't hit this issue, although I can see how annoying it would be for networks that prefer to do this.
I try to avoid them in customer-facing applications, too. And in intra-network situations, I don't know why you'd be LAGging 1Gbps links anymore.
But yeah, MX204 and similar LCs on the chassis platforms have some bizarre port usage/speed limitations. Juniper has a little web page to validate your port configurations, but it still seems easy to hit gotchas like this.
-- Brandon Martin
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Hank Nussbacher (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Aled Morris via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Aled Morris via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Gavin Henry (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative Phil Lavin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Hank Nussbacher (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative tim () pelican org (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Butterworth (Sep 02)