nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mx204 alternative
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:16:10 +0200
On 8/Aug/19 05:33, Brandon Martin wrote:
MX204 is a very nice pizza box router for service providers. I'm not aware of anything quite like it in terms of having a mature control plane. I like the JunOS config language better than Cisco-style that most other folks use.
The MX204 is pretty hard to beat. It fits well as a peering/transit router, as well as a Metro-E router where you need a 100Gbps ring to carry 10Gbps customers, as well as downstream cheaper routers that will do sub-10Gbps quite nicely. That said, at least for the Metro, I still believe a lighter version of the MX204, with dense 1Gbps capability, is still needed. Been asking since 2007. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Hank Nussbacher (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Aled Morris via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Aled Morris via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Gavin Henry (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative Phil Lavin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Hank Nussbacher (Sep 02)