nanog mailing list archives
Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:34:51 -0400
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:02:58 +0300, T�ma Gavrichenkov said:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:20 PM Christoffer Hansen <christoffer () netravnen de> wrote:Imagine ARIN did a take from RIPE NCC [Policy Proposal Idea?] and a policy came into effect of validating ALL 'OrgAbuseEmail' objects listed in the ARIN database.Just to be precise, such a policy (2019-04) is still in a discussion phase in RIPE and has already seen significant resistance.
OK, I'll bite. What reasons are they giving for their resistance? (And if known, what are the *real* reasons if different?)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: really amazon?, (continued)
- Re: really amazon? Chris Knipe (Jul 30)
- User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Scott Christopher (Jul 30)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Matt Hoppes (Jul 30)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) John Curran (Jul 30)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Sandra Murphy (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Mark Andrews (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Chris Knipe (Jul 30)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 30)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Steve Pointer (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Joe Provo (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Robert McKay (Jul 30)
- Not noreply autoresponder (WAS: really amazon?) Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)