nanog mailing list archives
Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:51:17 +0300
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019, 5:05 AM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <giri () dombox org> wrote:
@Töma Gavrichenkov In theory, I can easily recall a few cases in my life when goingthrough just 50 words was quite enough for a judgment.How can you be so sure that you didn't fuck up none of the lives of these "few cases"? Or in more technical terms, How can you be absolutely sure that there is no "False Positives"?
Easily. I shouldn't have been rude with Töma Gavrichenkov
Oh, feel free to, I don't really care. -- Töma
Current thread:
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request], (continued)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Brielle Bruns (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] William Herrin (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] John Von Essen (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Tom Beecher (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Dave Crocker (Feb 20)
- RE: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] bzs (Feb 20)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Brielle Bruns (Feb 20)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 20)
- Re: sendmail.cf Brielle Bruns (Feb 20)
- Re: sendmail.cf bzs (Feb 21)
- Re: sendmail.cf Bjørn Mork (Feb 22)
- Re: sendmail.cf bzs (Feb 22)