nanog mailing list archives
Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:33:39 +0100
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <giri () dombox org> wrote a message of 111 lines which said:
Just gone through all your replies.
And apparently you did not read them and did not take any lesson in it.
Literally everyone attacking me here.
In the current thread, NOT ONE reply was an attack. All the replies were kind and considerate (franly, much more than what you deserved) and explained why you are wrong. Read them again. Really. It would help you. This is probably your last chance before everyone definitely classify you as "useless crank".
One guy was attacking me for my poor english skills. Excuse me for not being poetic in my paper. I studied in my local language. English was an alien language to me.
English is not my mother tongue either and I make many mistakes. But I try to fix them, and do not complain when people who speak better english correct me. Frankly, as someone who has trouble understanding people speaking at the IETF meetings, I do not think that english is your main problem.
None of never completed my paper.
Nobody is forced to. There are more interesting papers to read that anyone have time to do so. We have to decide what to read and what to ignore. Why should we drop promising papers and read yours, when the external appearance is that of a guy who does not listen, does not know what he is talking about, and just complains endlessly how the world is unfair?
Current thread:
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request], (continued)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] James Downs (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Jon Lewis (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] bzs (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Matt Harris (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] John Adams (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Ross Tajvar (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Mark Tinka (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 17)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] James Bensley (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Brielle Bruns (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] William Herrin (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] John Von Essen (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Tom Beecher (Feb 18)
- Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request] Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 18)