nanog mailing list archives
Re: DDoS attack
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:53:19 +0200
On 9/Dec/19 22:32, Florian Brandstetter via NANOG wrote:
In any regard, <1 Gbps is pretty piss poor for an amplification attack too.
Must be nice :-)... Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: DDoS attack, (continued)
- Re: DDoS attack Alain Hebert (Dec 10)
- Re: DDoS attack Mel Beckman (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Christopher Morrow (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Filip Hruska (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Mike Hammett (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Florian Brandstetter via NANOG (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Mike Lewinski (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Brandon Martin (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Sabri Berisha (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Mark Tinka (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 10)
- RE: DDoS attack Aaron Gould (Dec 10)
- Re: DDoS attack Saku Ytti (Dec 10)
- RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: DDoS attack Nikos Leontsinis (Dec 10)
- RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: DDoS attack Paul Amaral via NANOG (Dec 10)