nanog mailing list archives
Re: DDoS attack
From: Mike Lewinski <mlewinski () massivenetworks com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:05:14 +0000
In any regard, <1 Gbps is pretty piss poor for an amplification attack too.
We've observed a customer receiving relative low volume attacks in the last week (so low they didn't trigger our alarms). My working theory is that with the Dec 3rd release of Halo Reach for PC, there are gamers attempting to lag, but not knock off, their opponents. This would be one reason to target adjacent unused addresses.
Current thread:
- DDoS attack ahmed.dalaali () hrins net (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Christopher Morrow (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Tim Požár (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Alain Hebert (Dec 10)
- Re: DDoS attack Mel Beckman (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Christopher Morrow (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Tim Požár (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Filip Hruska (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Mike Hammett (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Florian Brandstetter via NANOG (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Mike Lewinski (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Brandon Martin (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Sabri Berisha (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Mark Tinka (Dec 09)
- Re: DDoS attack Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 10)
- Re: DDoS attack Christopher Morrow (Dec 09)
- RE: DDoS attack Aaron Gould (Dec 10)