nanog mailing list archives

Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai


From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 12:01:21 -0800

I think this thread might be a perfect example that when an organization
reaches a sufficiently large size, one part of its engineering/operations
team may no longer be fully aware of what other work groups are doing.
Definitely a structural challenge for ISPs that span very large
geographical areas and services/roles.





On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 11:06 AM Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:



On Dec 7, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us> wrote:

On 12/6/19 06:46, Fawcett, Nick via NANOG wrote:
We had three onsite Akamai caches a few months ago.  They called us up
and said they are removing that service and sent us boxes to pack up the
hardware and ship back.  We’ve had quite the increase in DIA traffic as a
result of it.


Same here, removed last month, and no more Akamai traffic over peering
since.

This last part doesn’t sound right.

Can you send me details in private?

Thanks,

- Jared

Current thread: