Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation (fwd)

[Carlos Friaças via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Matt Harris wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:28 AM Carlos Friaças via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
>
>       Hi,
>
>       Just to let everybody know that a petition was started in order to try
>       to enable a policy discussion about "BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy
>       Violation".
>
>       If you would like to read the proposal, it is available at:
>       https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/proposals/2019/ARIN_prop_266_v2/
>
>       Discussions are already ongoing at RIPE and LACNIC.
>
>       Best Regards,
>       Carlos
>
>
> Hey Carlos,Can you (or someone else on the list, perhaps even someone who was involved in voting this down) provide 
> some more
> details as to why it was rejected?  What were the arguments in favor of rejecting the proposal?  This seems like an 
> interesting
> idea to me, and one that I can't immediately come up with any arguments against from my own perspective.  There's 
> probably some
> room for discussing and tuning specifics, but ultimately the concept seems reasonable to me.  What am I missing here?  

Hi,

Sure...

https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/ac/meetings/2019_0410
(Meeting of the ARIN Advisory Council - 10 April 2019)

You can also find the RIPE and LACNIC URLs here:
+ https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-03
+ https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2019-5?language=en


Best Regards,
Carlos


> Thanks,
> Matt