nanog mailing list archives

Re: Most peered AS per country


From: Tore Anderson <tore () fud no>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:37:20 +0100

* Mehmet Akcin

I am noticing provider A enters market X saying they are tier 1 network but they do not have a si ngle peering 
session in country and they backhaul everything back to market Z where they deliver traffic to the peer via high 
latency and low performance method. This is causing market to receive pricing targets which are unrealistic and 
hurting telecoms who are genuinely trying to do right thing and establish in country direct peering with peers.

Yeah, don't fall for the marketing hyperbole. A transit provider's «tier»
is an extremely poor indicator of its interconnectedness and quality,
especially if your traffic is regional in nature. In most cases you'll be
much better off buying your IP transit from a regional «tier-2» provider,
which tends to give you much better connectivity to other networks in your
region - in addition to all the global connectivity that the «tier-2»'s
upstream(s) provide, of course.

Tore


Current thread: