nanog mailing list archives
Re: Most peered AS per country
From: Tore Anderson <tore () fud no>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:37:20 +0100
* Mehmet Akcin
I am noticing provider A enters market X saying they are tier 1 network but they do not have a si ngle peering session in country and they backhaul everything back to market Z where they deliver traffic to the peer via high latency and low performance method. This is causing market to receive pricing targets which are unrealistic and hurting telecoms who are genuinely trying to do right thing and establish in country direct peering with peers.
Yeah, don't fall for the marketing hyperbole. A transit provider's «tier» is an extremely poor indicator of its interconnectedness and quality, especially if your traffic is regional in nature. In most cases you'll be much better off buying your IP transit from a regional «tier-2» provider, which tends to give you much better connectivity to other networks in your region - in addition to all the global connectivity that the «tier-2»'s upstream(s) provide, of course. Tore
Current thread:
- Most peered AS per country Mehmet Akcin (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Bill Woodcock (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Mehmet Akcin (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Bill Woodcock (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Mehmet Akcin (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Mike Hammett (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Dan Bateyko (Nov 28)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Tore Anderson (Nov 28)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Mehmet Akcin (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Bill Woodcock (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Tashi Phuntsho (Nov 28)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Mehmet Akcin (Nov 27)
- Re: Most peered AS per country Bradley Huffaker (Nov 27)