nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:46:30 +0200
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 07:33:08AM -0400, Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net> wrote a message of 7 lines which said:
We already have 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4.
And 9.9.9.9 and several others public DNS resolvers.
And any reputable company or ISP should be running their own.
I fully agree.
What purpose would this serve?
In Europe, the most common technique of censorship is through lying DNS resolvers. So, in order to go to forbidden Web sites (music and film sharing, for instance), many users switched from the ISP's resolver (which implements the censorship) to a public resolver. See my talk at NANOG <https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/Bortzmeyer_Dns-Based_Censorship.pdf>
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jared Mauch (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? David Ulevitch (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Tony Finch (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? DaKnOb (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Matt Hoppes (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mike Hammett (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? DaKnOb (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chip Marshall (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Doug Clements (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Izaac (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? John Kinsella (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chris Adams (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Michael Crapse (Mar 29)