nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Doug Clements <dclements () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:13:06 -0400
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Chip Marshall <chip () 2bithacker net> wrote:
I think the real question is "when are we going to get some memorable IPv6 public recursive DNS servers?" 2001:4860:4860::8888 or 2620:fe::fe just aren't quite as catchy as 8.8.8.8 or 9.9.9.9.
From https://1.1.1.1/:
For IPv6: *2001:2001::* and/or *2001:2001:2001::* Those are pretty catchy. --Doug
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Tony Finch (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Michael Crapse (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? DaKnOb (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Matt Hoppes (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mike Hammett (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? DaKnOb (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chip Marshall (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Doug Clements (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Izaac (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? John Kinsella (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chris Adams (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Michael Crapse (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Alan Buxey (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? DaKnOb (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jimmy Hess (Mar 29)