Re: How are you configuring BFD timers?

[Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog () lixfeld ca>]

They were ME3600s.  AFAIR it was two of these things in a lab connected back to back with two links between them, one 
metric higher than the other.  Some sort of traffic generator running between the two that would generate fixed size 
UDP frames at some tens of milliseconds interval, yanking the preferred link, counting how many packets were lost and 
doing some math, correlating with various logs debugs on the boxes.

> On Mar 21, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <bengelly () gmail com> wrote:
>
> Which platform ? What context ?
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> > Le 21 mars 2018 à 18:10, Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog () lixfeld ca> a écrit :
> >
> > A few years ago I did some testing and found that the time between the transceiver detecting LOS and the routing 
> > protocol (ISIS in this case) being informed that the link was down (triggering the recalculation) took longer than 
> > it took BFD to signal ISIS to recalculate.
> >
> > > On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Wouldn't any tangible problem on a dark-fiber link result in an interface shutdown, ostensibly creating the trigger 
> > > one would need to begin re-convergence?
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 3/21/18 11:31 AM, Alex Lembesis wrote:
> > > > To speed up BGP routing convergence.  The (2x) dark fiber links from PA to FL are being used as Layer3 datacenter 
> > > > interconnects, where each datacenter has its own AS.  The DF is also carrying FCIP traffic, so we need failover to 
> > > > be as fast as possible.
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Alex
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Job Snijders (External) [mailto:job () instituut net]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:25 PM
> > > > To: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
> > > > Cc: Alex Lembesis; NANOG
> > > > Subject: Re: How are you configuring BFD timers?
> > > > Silly question perhaps, but why would you do BFD on dark fiber?
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Job
> > > > This message is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary 
> > > > information and may be subject to attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a 
> > > > designated recipient you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please 
> > > > notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.