nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:42:37 +0200
There are several ISPs doing trials (thousands of users). RFC6877 (464XLAT), section 4. Network Architecture, indicates clearly “Wireline Network Architecture can be used in situations where there are clients behind the CLAT, regardless of the type of access service -- for example, fiber to the home (FTTH), Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS), or WiFi.” Vendors confirmed two weeks ago they have implementations in CEs. RFC7084 was created before all the new transition technologies (including 464XLAT and MAP, for example, or even lw4o6 that has many advantages compared to DS-LITE, being the same but requiring a much simpler CGN), so that’s why I’m working to update it (most probably as an “accompanying document” only for the transition part: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-transition New versions to be publish this week hopefully … Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> en nombre de Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> Organización: People's Front Against WWW Responder a: <swmike () swm pp se> Fecha: sábado, 23 de septiembre de 2017, 13:22 Para: Fredrik Sallinen <fredrik.sallinen () gmail com> CC: <nanog () nanog org> Asunto: Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Fredrik Sallinen wrote: > Please correct me If I'm wrong, AFAIK 464XLAT works best with mobile > networks and its not suitable for fixed broadband. right? It's most widely deployed in mobile networks, yes. There is nothing that says it couldn't work anywhere else. However, in fixed networks with PPPoE the most commonly used model is dual stack with RFC7084 style routers. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Owen DeLong (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Baldur Norddahl (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Ahad Aboss (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Owen DeLong (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Måns Nilsson (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Fredrik Sallinen (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sep 25)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Lee Howard (Sep 26)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Fredrik Sallinen (Sep 23)