nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:19:57 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Fredrik Sallinen wrote:
Please correct me If I'm wrong, AFAIK 464XLAT works best with mobile networks and its not suitable for fixed broadband. right?
It's most widely deployed in mobile networks, yes. There is nothing that says it couldn't work anywhere else.
However, in fixed networks with PPPoE the most commonly used model is dual stack with RFC7084 style routers.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp sthaug (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Owen DeLong (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Baldur Norddahl (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Ahad Aboss (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Owen DeLong (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Måns Nilsson (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Fredrik Sallinen (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sep 25)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Lee Howard (Sep 26)
- Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp Fredrik Sallinen (Sep 23)