nanog mailing list archives

Re: Purchased IPv4 Woes


From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:38:05 -0500

Just because he choose poorly with his email provider doesn't mean he
should be allowed to be exploited Mike, although a friendly ribbing is
still justified IMO ;)

On Mar 20, 2017 9:27 AM, "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

He did mention Hotmail.




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP

----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Reynolds" <josh () kyneticwifi com>
To: "Justin Wilson" <lists () mtin net>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 9:06:00 AM
Subject: Re: Purchased IPv4 Woes

Would you mind naming the company so that they can be publicly shamed? That
is nothing sort of extortion.

On Mar 19, 2017 10:36 PM, "Justin Wilson" <lists () mtin net> wrote:


Then you have the lists which want money to be removed. I have an IP that
was blacklisted by hotmail. Just a single IP. I have gone through the
procedures that are referenced in the return e-mails. No response. My
next step says something about a $2500 fee to have it investigated. I
know
several blacklists which are this way. Luckily, many admins do not use
such lists.


Justin Wilson
j2sw () mtin net

---
http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth

http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman
Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric

On Mar 12, 2017, at 9:10 PM, Bob Evans <bob () FiberInternetCenter com>
wrote:

Pete's right about how IPs get put on the lists. In fact, let us not
forget that these lists were mostly created with volunteers - some
still
today. Many are very old lists. Enterprise networks select lists by
some
sort of popularity / fame - etc.. Like how they decide to install
8.8.8.8
as first - its easy and they think its better than their local ISP they
pay.... yet they always call the ISP about slowness when 8.8.8.8 is for
consumers and doesn't always resolve quickly. It's a tough sale.

Once had a customer's employee abuse their mail server - it made some
lists. Customer complained our network is hosting spammers and sticking
them in the middle of a problem that is our networks. Hard win. Took us
months to get that IP off lists. That was one single IP. We did not
allow
them to renew their contract once the term was over. Now, they suffer
with
comcast for business. ;-)

Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO




On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Pete Baldwin wrote:

So this is is really the question I had, and this is why I was
wanting to
start a dialog here, hoping that it wasn't out of line for the list.
I
don't
know of a way to let a bunch of operators know that they should
remove
something without using something like this mailing list.
Blacklists
are
supposed to fill this role so that one operator doesn't have to try
and
contact thousands of other operators individually, he/she just has to
appeal
to the blacklist and once delisted all should be well in short order.

In cases where companies have their own internal lists, or only
update
them a couple of times a year from the major lists, I don't know of
another
way to notify everyone.

I suspect you'll find many of the private "blacklistings" are hand
maintained (added to as needed, never removed from unless requested)
and
you'll need to play whack-a-mole, reaching out to each network as you
find
they have the space blocked on their mail servers or null routed on
their
networks. I doubt your message here will be seen by many of the "right
people." How many company mail server admins read NANOG? How many
companies even do email in-house and have mail server admins anymore?
:)

Back when my [at that time] employer was issued some of 69/8, I found
it
useful to setup a host with IPs in 69/8 and in one of our older IP
blocks,
and then do both automated reachability testing and allow anyone to
do a
traceroute from both source IPs simultaneously, keeping the results
in a
DB. If you find there are many networks actually null routing your
purchased space, you might setup something similar.

------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
| therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public
key_________









Current thread: