nanog mailing list archives
Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble
From: Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:18:35 -0600
Once upon a time, valdis.kletnieks () vt edu <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> said:
There's only 2 certs. You generate 2 certs with the same hash, and *then* get the CA to sign one of them.
The point is that the signed cert you get back from the CA will have a different hash, and the things that they change that cause the hash to change are outside your control and prediction. -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Current thread:
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble, (continued)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Brett Frankenberger (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Matt Palmer (Feb 26)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Keith Medcalf (Feb 26)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Jon Lewis (Feb 27)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Eitan Adler (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Randy Bush (Feb 27)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Matt Palmer (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Chris Adams (Feb 27)