nanog mailing list archives

Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble


From: Tei <oscar.vives () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:16:38 +0100

On 23 February 2017 at 20:59, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:27 AM Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 () gmail com>
wrote:

Coworker passed this on to me.

Looks like SHA1 hash collisions are now achievable in a reasonable time
period
https://shattered.io/

-Grant


Good thing we "secure" our routing protocols with MD5

:)






One place that use sha1 seems to be some banking gateways.  They sign the
parameters of some request to authentificate the request has a valid one
doing something like "sha1( MerchantID . secureCode . TerminalID . amount .
exponent . moneyCode )".    I have no idea how evil people would exploit
collisions here, but I guest banking will move to the next hash algorithm
(sha256?) and deprecate this one.   This may affect more "Mom and Pa Online
Shop" than bigger services.


-- 
--
ℱin del ℳensaje.


Current thread: