nanog mailing list archives
Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:40:34 -0500
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ken Chase <math () sizone org> wrote:
If its not just cogent then we have an even larger issue -- that theres asymetric application of rulings. So we should just assume that if we can't get to something via cogent then all backbones within the same jurisdiction(*) should or will also have the same sites/ips
my experience (admittedly dated a bit) is that the people making the request really don't know :( they target who they think will fix their problem... sorta. good luck fellow travelers!
Current thread:
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites, (continued)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Florian Weimer (Feb 17)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites tim () pelican org (Feb 17)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Florian Weimer (Feb 17)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Florian Weimer (Feb 17)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Christopher Morrow (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Ken Chase (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Christopher Morrow (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Christopher Morrow (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Ken Chase (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Christopher Morrow (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Jean-Francois Mezei (Feb 10)