Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

> Have we determined that this is intentional vs. some screw up?
if you look at the cogent LG it's pretty clear that the announce
reachability for the /20 that includes the tpb /32.. and that the /32 is
particularly routed elsewhere, and that the 'elsewhere' is coming form a
bgp speaker who's DNS says something along the lines of: "blackhole"...

so... err, either someone fat-fingered OR intentionally entered a /32 into
the config management system :(


> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Brielle Bruns" <bruns () 2mbit com>
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 12:28:53 PM
> Subject: Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites
>
> On 2/9/17 9:18 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> > https://torrentfreak.com/internet-backbone-provider-
> cogent-blocks-pirate-bay-and-other-pirate-sites-170209/
> > /kc
>
> Funny. Someone else got back:
>
> "Abuse cannot not provide you a list of websites that may be
> encountering reduced visibility via Cogent"
>
> I almost wish I had a Cogent circuit just to bring this up with an
> account rep. Almost.
>
> I'd very much so view this as a contractual violation on Cogent's part.
>
> Cogent keeps contacting me every year wanting to sell me service. This
> will be a good one to bring up when they call me next time.
>
> --
> Brielle Bruns
> The Summit Open Source Development Group
> http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org