nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT security
From: clinton mielke <clinton.mielke () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:00:34 -0800
That being said, I think if other ISPs took virgins lead then we can start getting this population of devices reduced. The hard part is getting overseas ISPs to help with the problem. Most inbound infectious scanning traffic appears to come from China and Vietnam. I need to create some better aggregate statistics. On Feb 10, 2017 5:48 AM, "Marco Slater" <marco () marcoslater com> wrote:
As an ISP, scan your customers netrange, and notify customers with known vulnerable devices. With regards to the current Mirai threat, theresonly ahandful of devices that are the most critical importance. IE, biggest fraction of the infected host pie.Virgin Media in the UK do this for Mirai-infected or susceptible devices already. What they send out: https://twitter.com/2sec4u/status/825337376692121601 Quite interesting approach. If more consumers were aware of this, they may do something about it.. although.. people are lazy. :(
Current thread:
- Re: IoT security, (continued)
- Re: IoT security Damian Menscher (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Carl Byington (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Marco Slater (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security bzs (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Michael Thomas (Feb 07)
- RE: IoT security Keith Medcalf (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 10)