nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT security
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:14:03 -0800
On 02/07/2017 02:05 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:56:40AM -0500, William Herrin wrote:Immaterial. The point is to catch vulnerable devices before they're hacked.you have a 30 second window there, maybe five minutes if you are lucky.Hi Randy, I'd expect a tattler kill switch to take maybe a tenth of that from the anycast notification when the nic comes up to the ISPs response that it is known to be vulnerable and should disconnect.
assuming that it wasn't conveniently factory installed, cf usb sticks. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: IoT security, (continued)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Marco Slater (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security bzs (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Michael Thomas (Feb 07)
- RE: IoT security Keith Medcalf (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 10)