nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 21:13:37 -0400
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:
Preventing government manhandling needs to be a design goal.
Can you proffer some potential solutions or directions to look? At the end of the day the ISP or DNS operator or Enterprise is subject to local law enforcement action(s), so I'm not sure there's a remedy to your design goal.
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 15)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)