nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:04:43 -0400
On 9/14/16 3:09 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Yes, RPKI. That's what I was waiting for. Now we can get to a real discussion
Problem is, RPKI does not work for people with legacy blocks who will not sign a Legacy RSA. ARIN doesn't own or have any say on how we use it, and we're sure as heck not going to sign a legally binding contract saying they do :) I'm a bit ambivalent about BGP hijacking as a DDOS mitigation strategy. Really there is no authority to say it's wrong. If your peers are cool with it, and their peers are cool with it who's to say it's wrong? -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 15)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)