nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spitballing IoT Security

From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:58:07 -0700

On 10/29/2016 05:32 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:

you don't need
to be either an omnious "state actor" or even SPECTER to assemble a
truly massive packet weapon.


Please, it's SPECTRE .... show some respect

Current thread:

Re: Spitballing IoT Security, (continued)
- - - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Tom Beecher (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eric S. Raymond (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eric S. Raymond (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 30)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security John Weekes (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Pierre Lamy (Oct 31)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Doug Barton (Oct 30)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Rich Kulawiec (Oct 30)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Jim Hickstein (Oct 30)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eliot Lear (Oct 27)
    - RE: Spitballing IoT Security Keith Medcalf (Oct 28)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Alan Buxey (Oct 29)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Chris Boyd (Oct 25)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eliot Lear (Oct 28)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 25)
    - RE: Spitballing IoT Security Steve Mikulasik (Oct 24)
    - Re: Spitballing IoT Security J. Oquendo (Oct 24)

(Thread continues...)