nanog mailing list archives

Re: Voip faxing


From: Carlos Alcantar <carlos () race com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 04:52:46 +0000

Hey Samual,


you might want to check out the voice ops mailing list, might be a bit more relevant over there.


https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

VoiceOps Info Page - Welcome to puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops>
puck.nether.net
This is the VoiceOps Mailing list. This list is for discussions related to managing voice networks, both traditional 
and IP. The VOIP Operators' Group (VOG) charter ...







Carlos Alcantar

Race Communications / Race Team Member

1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010

Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / carlos () race com<mailto:carlos () race com> / http://www.race.com<http://www.race.com/>

________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Samual Carman <starwars1070 () gmail com>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 9:45:52 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Voip faxing

Hello if this is not allowed please ignore and inform me that it not allowed however I could think of no better place 
for this
I would like to know why there has not been more wide support of the V.38 or v.17 v.34 or the old style g.711 protocols 
for faxing over voip
Based on my understanding it is an difficult in an IP based environment for faxing to work reliably however based on my 
understanding V.38 was suppose to fix that however the research I have conducted in regards to the support of these 
protocols is that there not widely implimted and besides G.711 which was designed for voice that proviso is somewhat 
implored on a wider scale
However I understand faxing is archaic but in some fields it is necessary
Thanks Sam Please excuse spelling and grammar as this was typed on my phone

Get Outlook for iOS


Current thread: