nanog mailing list archives
Re: Voip faxing
From: Carlos Alcantar <carlos () race com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 04:52:46 +0000
Hey Samual, you might want to check out the voice ops mailing list, might be a bit more relevant over there. https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops VoiceOps Info Page - Welcome to puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops> puck.nether.net This is the VoiceOps Mailing list. This list is for discussions related to managing voice networks, both traditional and IP. The VOIP Operators' Group (VOG) charter ... Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / carlos () race com<mailto:carlos () race com> / http://www.race.com<http://www.race.com/> ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Samual Carman <starwars1070 () gmail com> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 9:45:52 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Voip faxing Hello if this is not allowed please ignore and inform me that it not allowed however I could think of no better place for this I would like to know why there has not been more wide support of the V.38 or v.17 v.34 or the old style g.711 protocols for faxing over voip Based on my understanding it is an difficult in an IP based environment for faxing to work reliably however based on my understanding V.38 was suppose to fix that however the research I have conducted in regards to the support of these protocols is that there not widely implimted and besides G.711 which was designed for voice that proviso is somewhat implored on a wider scale However I understand faxing is archaic but in some fields it is necessary Thanks Sam Please excuse spelling and grammar as this was typed on my phone Get Outlook for iOS
Current thread:
- Voip faxing Samual Carman (Oct 30)
- Re: Voip faxing Carlos Alcantar (Oct 30)
- Re: Voip faxing John Osmon (Oct 31)
- Re: Voip faxing Carlos Alcantar (Oct 30)