nanog mailing list archives

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:01:26 +0200



On 6/May/16 02:18, g () 1337 io wrote:

If you are considering pfSense, I would urge you to look at OPNsense
instead. The pfSense code is horrible!


Can you explain?

We've been reasonably happy with it, running it since 2012 on dozens of
boxes for our corporate network and as OpenVPN servers.

Mark.

Current thread:

sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Ken Chase (May 05)
- Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application amuse (May 05)
  - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application g () 1337 io (May 05)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Mark Tinka (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application amuse (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Nick Hilliard (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Mel Beckman (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application amuse (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Mark Tinka (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Aris Lambrianidis (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Mark Tinka (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Mark Tinka (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Mel Beckman (May 06)
    - Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application Keith Stokes (May 06)

(Thread continues...)