nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:32:12 -0400

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Bohn <bohn () adelphi edu> wrote:
So if someone (say an eyeball network) was putting out a RFQ for a gig say
of upstream cxn and wanted to spec full reachability to the full V6 net,
what would the wording for that spec look like?

Maybe require something roughly like this in the SLA:

"Customer may notify Provider upon discovery of a network Partition. A
Partition exists when correct BGP routes available via at least 90% of
comparable Internet service providers are absent from Provider's BGP
feed or do not otherwise function. Where such Partition persists for
at least 6 hours from notification, Provider shall make a 100% service
credit starting from notification. Where such Partition persists for
at least 24 hours, Customer may terminate this contract without
penalty until 30 days following the Partition's end."

Would that get $provider's attention?

No. They'll either agree blindly or consider you a hard case. Either
way it won't change their actual behavior.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>


Current thread: