nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:18:27 -0600 (CST)
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-February/084147.html ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Burgess" <dmburgess () linktechs net> To: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 10:01:12 AM Subject: Cogent - Google - HE Fun I just noticed that I am NOT getting IPV6 Google prefixes though Cogent at all. I was told google pulled all of their peering with Cogent? If I bring up a SIT tunnel with HE, I get the prefixes but at horrible speed and latency .. anyone else? [DennisBurgessSignature] www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> - 314-735-0270 x103 - dmburgess () linktechs net<mailto:dmburgess () linktechs net>
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun, (continued)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Christopher Morrow (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Mark Tinka (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Mark Tinka (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Mark Tinka (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Baldur Norddahl (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 13)