nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP and Optical domains?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:17:35 +0900
Mark Tinka wrote:
Typical awareness about the transport layer is not normally privy to IP. Yes, IPoDWDM means the visbility is there, but really, all it's doing is cutting off a link just before the thresholds are met, to avoid packet loss.
What? "the visibility is there"? I think you mean IPoDWDM something so much different from usual ways to have IP over something. Do you have any reference to it? For my definition of IPoDWDM, see, for example: "Standardization of optical packet switching with many-wavelength packets" http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=4542288 or my newest paper in HPSR2016. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IP and Optical domains?, (continued)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 20)