nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP and Optical domains?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:13:50 +0200
On 20/Jun/16 12:45, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
So if you have a fiber break, you're not going to have enough overcapacity in your network to remain uncongested until this fiber break is fixed?
That was my point - we will have enough capacity on diverse routes to handle the outage. We deploy additional capacity primarily for growth. The resiliency aspect comes as an added advantage. The diverse paths are already in place. So it's just about adding more bandwidth between the paths in an equal manner. Mark.
Current thread:
- IP and Optical domains? Glen Kent (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Glen Kent (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)