nanog mailing list archives

Re: Monitoring system recommendation


From: Guillaume Tournat <guillaume () ironie org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:52:36 +0200

Things to notice, as I prefer Zabbix over nagios (real database related, more functionalities) :
- Zabbix actually is open source. You can buy support from them or from partners if you want
- Zabbix can be distributed through central/proxies architecture to scale
- nagios plugins can be adapted for Zabbix, as the later only needs numerical value (no status or text)


Le 7 juin 2016 à 07:11, Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net> a écrit :

I once worked for Zenoss and still suggest them. Zenoss supports NAGIOS
plugins, and my $DAYJOB is at a Zenoss Partner who can help you achieve
your goals.  If you need some help with Zenoss feel free to contact me off
list.

Andrew

On Monday, June 6, 2016, Manuel Marín <mmg () transtelco net> wrote:

Dear Nanog community

We are currently planning to upgrade our monitoring system (Opsview) due to
scalability issues and I was wondering what do you recommend for monitoring
5000 hosts and 35000 services. We would like to use a monitoring system
that is compatible with the nagios plugin format, however we are not sure
if systems like Icinga/Shinken/Op5 are the way to go.

Is someone using systems like Op5 or Icinga2 for monitoring > 5000 hosts?
Would you recommend commercial systems like Sevone, Zabbix, etc instead of
open source ones?

Your input is really appreciated it

Thank you and have a great day

Regards



Current thread: