Re: Monitoring system recommendation

[Matthew Pounsett <matt () conundrum com>]

On 6 June 2016 at 07:18, Manuel Marín <mmg () transtelco net> wrote:

> Dear Nanog community
>
> We are currently planning to upgrade our monitoring system (Opsview) due to
> scalability issues and I was wondering what do you recommend for monitoring
> 5000 hosts and 35000 services. We would like to use a monitoring system
> that is compatible with the nagios plugin format, however we are not sure
> if systems like Icinga/Shinken/Op5 are the way to go.
>
> Is someone using systems like Op5 or Icinga2 for monitoring > 5000 hosts?
> Would you recommend commercial systems like Sevone, Zabbix, etc instead of
> open source ones?

Although I haven't ever scaled it that high, I've had a lot of luck using
Gearman (mod_gearman) to make Nagios horizontally scalable.

It allows you to use Nagios itself only as a scheduler and reporting UI,
and offload all of the actual probing to other servers.  There'll be a
theoretical limit to the amount of scale you get get out of that due to
relying on a single Nagios instance to schedule checks and receive reports
of success, but I imagine it's much higher than your current requirements.