nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers
From: "Ryan, Spencer" <sryan () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 20:14:55 +0000
I would love to test it, but it will be no surprise that none of the four
carriers enabled IPv6. Verizon Wireless has been dual stack for many years, before they ran out of public IPv4 addresses and switched handsets to RFC1918 space for v4. ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:10:41 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Den 22. jul. 2016 20.25 skrev "Ca By" <cb.list6 () gmail com>:
Phones, as in 3gpp? If so, each phone alway gets a /64, there is no
choice.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6459
Here the cell companies are marketing their 4G LTE as an alternative to DSL, Coax and fiber for internet access in your home with a 4G wifi router. If they can not do prefix delegation it is no alternative! I would love to test it, but it will be no surprise that none of the four carriers enabled IPv6. Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ricardo Ferreira (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Tore Anderson (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Mikhail Gusarov (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Carsten Bormann (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)