nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:52:14 -0400
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:54:48 +0200, Ricardo Ferreira said:
Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed? We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it is /64 or /128. In RFC 3177, it says:
- /128 when it is absolutely known that one and only one device is connecting.
See this RFC, which is a recently released BCP: 7934 Host Address Availability Recommendations. L. Colitti, V. Cerf, S. Cheshire, D. Schinazi. July 2016. (Format: TXT=37124 bytes) (Also BCP0204) (Status: BEST CURRENT PRACTICE) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC7934) In short - even when you have only one device connecting, you probably need more than one address. Also, consider the common practice of tethering....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ricardo Ferreira (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Tore Anderson (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Mikhail Gusarov (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Carsten Bormann (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)