Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge

[Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>]

Newer, more expensive, more bugs. 4500 is cheap on the secondary market.
On Feb 6, 2016 3:38 PM, "David Bass" <davidbass570 () gmail com> wrote:

> Yeah, on the list...well the 4600 is since it's somewhat the replacement
> to the 4500/4550.
>
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com> wrote:
>
> Why not consider an EX4500?
> On Feb 6, 2016 12:24 PM, "Cameron Ferdinands" <cameron () jferdinands com>
> wrote:
>
> > If you need high-er density 10GE. Consider an Juniper ACX5048.
> >
> > Great edge box, MPLS features, it's essentially just a QFX with
> > repartitioned CAM / some tricks to get the most out of the Trident II
> > chipset.
> >
> > Won't do a bunch of things, so make sure it's exactly what you need or
> > you'll burn yourself YMMV.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:50 AM Dan Spataro <dspataro () corp nac net> wrote:
> >
> > > Depending on your interpretation of full MPLS stack, you can look into
> > the
> > > Brocade CES.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of David Bass
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 4:04 PM
> > > To: nanog () nanog org
> > > Subject: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
> > >
> > > Looking to see what others are using out there as an alternative to a
> > > Cisco ME3600X? Also, what other vendors out there are playing in this
> > space?
> > > Need a full MPLS stack.