nanog mailing list archives
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
From: Jérôme Nicolle <jerome () ceriz fr>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:50:26 +0100
Le 02/02/2016 23:38, Colton Conor a écrit :
We use some of the 7360's, but not the Mikrotik. Why not use ALU's CPE devices if using the 7360?
I'd use ALU's ONTs (there's now a SFP GPON stick available too) or RGWs on the client side, the Mikrotik here is the PE router, because ALU's FANT-F card lacks EoMPLS/ATOM/VPLS/E-VPN capabilities. I only use QinQ on its 4*10Gbps uplink ports. Any 80Gbps capable PE router would be fine, though. I choose the Mikrotik CRR1072 for its price and density. -- Jérôme Nicolle
Current thread:
- Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge David Bass (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Jérôme Nicolle (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Colton Conor (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Jérôme Nicolle (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge David Bass (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Colton Conor (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Baldur Norddahl (Feb 02)
- RE: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Dan Spataro (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Cameron Ferdinands (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge David Bass (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Josh Reynolds (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge David Bass (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Josh Reynolds (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Mike Hammett (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Cameron Ferdinands (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Jérôme Nicolle (Feb 02)