nanog mailing list archives
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:54:37 +0200
On 6/Feb/16 23:41, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Newer, more expensive, more bugs. 4500 is cheap on the secondary market.
The EX4600 is actually just a shy cheaper than the EX4550. We are looking at it not because the EX4550 is a bad box, but because Juniper are focusing development on the EX4600 instead (much like Cisco are doing between the ME3600X and ASR920). You lose 8x ports on the EX4600, though, if coming from the EX4550. May or may not be an issue for you. I wouldn't look at the EX4500. Too big and old now. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge, (continued)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge David Bass (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Baldur Norddahl (Feb 02)
- RE: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Dan Spataro (Feb 02)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Cameron Ferdinands (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge David Bass (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Josh Reynolds (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge David Bass (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Josh Reynolds (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Mike Hammett (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Mark Tinka (Feb 28)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Cameron Ferdinands (Feb 06)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Colton Conor (Feb 03)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Shawn L (Feb 03)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Mark Tinka (Feb 27)