nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cable Operator List
From: Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:58:39 -0500
The biggest reason to not do EuroDOCSIS is logistics and dealing with various TAC organizations versus a pretty small increase in per channel performance (but not per hertz). I'd pretty strongly recommend against it, just because you're going to run into issues ranging from buying modems, to dealing with node vendors, to finding people who can do basic stuff like plant balancing. You wouldn't think it would matter, but it throws people off to see that extra channel bandwidth. My 2 cents, buy CMTS/CCAP gear that's upgradeable to D3.1, ie CBR8, E6000, or the big Casa unit, for the time being shoot for 24 channel downstream bonding groups (24 * ~37mbps - overhead) which yields about 740 mbps usable. That's plenty for most nodes, especially since you're not offering video you can have many bonding groups since channel space isn't a problem. Scott Helms Chief Technology Officer ZCorum (678) 507-5000 -------------------------------- http://twitter.com/kscotthelms -------------------------------- On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com> wrote:
Daniel, Thanks for the wealth of information. What kind of speeds are you offering? How many customers are you putting on one of these boxes? What modems are you using? I would honestly perfer something that was hardened for outdoor use. Think garden style apartments. What is the best for something like that? Comparing DOCIS 3 to VDSL2, the modems and CMTS appear to be more cost effective per customer. G.FAST I have not seen pricing on, but I expect it to be more than VDSL2. Any reasons not to use EURO DOCSIS in the USA? Looks like it offers more speeds by using fatter channels. We don't plan on offering TV, but even if we did couldn't we just start the channels at a higher range, and still use EURO DOCSIS? On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com> wrote:Hey Colton, We’re using small 16 channel CMTS systems for residential MDUs and colocating them directly on premise inside of wiring closets and then connecting them by metro ethernet. We’ve had great successes so far with this model. There’s lots of CMTS vendors. There’s tons of used Motorola BSR 64Ks on the market, but be aware of the lack of useful IPv6 features (like prefix delegation) in older software releases. If you buy a box and want to run 7.x or 8.x, you’ll need to relicense your downstream and upstream channels at some additional arbitrary fixed cost. I’m personally fond of these things: http://picodigital.com/product-details.php?ID=miniCMTS200a You can only bond 16 channels together max though because that’s all the box supports and you can’t bond across boxes; however, these things are less than 4 grand if you buy them in bulk so they’re really fucking easytojust spam everywhere. Blonder Tongue makes a pizza-box style CMTS too:http://www.blondertongue.com/shop-by-department/catv/ip-over-coax/docsis/euro-docsis/As does Harmonics: http://harmonicinc.com/product/cable-edge/nsg-exo All three are based on the same chipset, so the real differentiation is price and firmware features. Then there’s Cisco. The UBR is a popular platform. And pretty soon there’s going to be aglutof UBR10Ks on the Market because Comcast is busy ripping their UBRs outofproduction because they’re upgrading their cable plant to the CBRplatform.Then the Arris C4, if you have deep pockets, is a modern version of the BSR: http://www.arris.com/products/c4-cmts/On Feb 2, 2016, at 9:00 AM, Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com>wrote:Well, maybe NANOG's not a bad place for this post then! I would like toknow more about the data-only side of CMTS systems, and who the main vendors are.We have MDU properties where there is either old inside CAT3 phonewire,or coaxial cable. We have looked and are very familiar with the multiple technologies that work over phone lines namely VDSL2 and G.FAST. However, using the coaxial cable seems to be a much better solution than using the phone wires.So I am looking for compacts, low cost CMTS systems. Based on thespecs,I am looking for something at least DOCSIS 3.0 capable, with at least16X4output. Something with the ability to upgrade to software upgrade toDOCSIS3.1 would be nice, but I doubt that would be a low cost solution.Whats out there for small operators that don't want a large chassisbased system to feed an entire town with.So far I have found thehttp://picodigital.com/product-details.php?ID=miniCMTS200a which seemstoretail for under $5000.On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com>wrote:On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com>wrote:Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated for cable/MSO type operators?I'm curious about this too. I’m not a cable operator (in that I haven’t successfully registered fora cable franchise yet) but I do operate a docsis network and I’ve successfully negotiated the treacherous waters of obtaining and providing content to my users.I’m still a bit green behind the ears but I could probably offer somemeasure of assistance if you have a specific question.-Daniel
Current thread:
- Re: Cable Operator List, (continued)
- Re: Cable Operator List Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Colton Conor (Feb 02)
- RE: Cable Operator List Graham Johnston (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Colton Conor (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Scott Helms (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Edwin Mallette (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List jamie rishaw (Feb 02)
- RE: Cable Operator List Graham Johnston (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Daniel Corbe (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Colton Conor (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Scott Helms (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Scott Helms (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Scott Helms (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Colton Conor (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Scott Helms (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Colton Conor (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Scott Helms (Feb 02)
- Re: Cable Operator List Colton Conor (Feb 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Cable Operator List Colton Conor (Feb 09)