nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:55:00 -0500
On Feb 18, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote: In other words, "hitless" does not mean "not service impacting".
I would assume any SMU impacts traffic and requires a reboot or a line card reset. There are types of SMUs that touch low level parts and require a reboot, in which case I’ve often told Cisco they should just rev the release number. Solving SMU dependencies is sometimes impossible. Right now the 5.3.3 SMU set posted on CCO can’t be installed with any of their automation/tools. We are waiting for Cisco to provide a fix. I’m not holding my breath. - Jared
Current thread:
- Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Colton Conor (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Jason Bothe (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Josh Reynolds (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Jason Bothe (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Josh Reynolds (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Mark Tinka (Feb 28)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Josh Reynolds (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Jared Mauch (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 David Bass (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Mark Tinka (Feb 28)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Jason Bothe (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Saku Ytti (Feb 18)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Mark Tinka (Feb 28)
- Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960 Mark Tinka (Feb 28)