nanog mailing list archives

Re: PCH Peering Paper


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:18:53 -0800

This assumes that there are no cooperatives providing settlement free peering which includes both peer and transit 
routes.

Owen

On Feb 17, 2016, at 14:09 , Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:

Each bit traverses only one peering session, however, at the "top of its trajectory" to use a physical metaphor. The 
uphill and downhill sides are all transit.


               -Bill


On Feb 17, 2016, at 14:06, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:


The premise above therefore devolves to: Since most of the traffic is to those networks, then most of the bits flow 
over contracted peerings.

Perhaps “most” can be argued, but obviously a significant portion of all peering bits flow over contracted 
sessions. Hopefully we can all agree on that.

There’s greater complexity here, however…

Many of the bits that flow flow over several networks between their source and destination. Likely the vast majority 
of bits traverse at least 3 autonomous systems in the process.

So when you want to count traffic that went over a non-contract peering session vs. traffic that went over a 
contract peering session, how do you count traffic that traverses some of each?

Owen



Current thread: