nanog mailing list archives
Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 13 Apr 2016 15:45:04 -0400
NANP geographical numbers can be located to a switch (give or take number portability within a LATA), but non-geographic numbers can really go anywhere. On the third hand, it's still true that the large majority of them are in the U.S.Would you agree that 408-921 is a geographic number?
No. It's a prefix, assigned to the at&t switch in west San Jose.
I guarantee you that there are phones within that prefix within US/Calif/LATA-1 and also some well outside of that, probably not even in the same country.
Who said anything about phones? Could you describe what "geographic numbers can be located to a switch" means to you?
Helpfully, John
Current thread:
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences, (continued)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Hugo Slabbert (Apr 11)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Josh Luthman (Apr 11)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Ken Chase (Apr 11)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 12)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Theodore Baschak (Apr 12)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences David Cantrell (Apr 13)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 13)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences David Cantrell (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John R. Levine (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Leo Bicknell (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Gary Buhrmaster (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Josh Reynolds (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Hugo Slabbert (Apr 11)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 14)