nanog mailing list archives

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance


From: Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:43:49 -0400

Minimal? Probably 22LR.  I prefer 458SOCOM though.  As Bob Evans notes,
there may be some waiting periods, serial numbers, and background checks
involved.  :)

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

http://www.procmail.org/
I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach.  There is no
obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet
services to them, including SMTP services.

computers are cheap.  my time is finite and i value it highly.  what is
the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time?

randy



Current thread: