Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

[Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>]

Some people here just strive to be dicks... 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 


----- Original Message -----

From: "George Herbert" <george.herbert () gmail com> 
To: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> 
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org>, "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk () gsp org> 
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 1:19:00 PM 
Subject: Re: IP-Echelon Compliance 


You guys aren't devious enough. 

These guys are in violation of CAN-SPAM. To the tune of exceeding the statutory maximum $1,000,000 per ISP last *month* 
for some of you, much less in the statute of limitations period. You could probably point to refusal to remove as 
justifying the triple damages claim. 

Everyone on this list just earned your companies $3 million. 

Call your attorneys. 


George William Herbert 
Sent from my iPhone 

On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote: 

> > > http://www.procmail.org/ 
> > I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach. There is no 
> > obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet 
> > services to them, including SMTP services. 
>
> computers are cheap. my time is finite and i value it highly. what is 
> the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time? 
>
> randy