nanog mailing list archives
Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 19:05:41 -0800
On 03/01/2015 01:44 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
fairly certain that none of these folk block port 25 on their business customer links.
Correct as far as Charter goes. Particularly for people with dedicated IP addresses, as I do. I can't speak for DHCP address space.
Current thread:
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality, (continued)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality John Levine (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Christopher Morrow (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality John R. Levine (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Owen DeLong (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality John R. Levine (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Owen DeLong (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Dave Taht (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Stephen Satchell (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality John Levine (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Livingood, Jason (Mar 01)
- Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Stephen Satchell (Mar 01)