nanog mailing list archives

RE: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4


From: "Tony Wicks" <tony () wicks co nz>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:13:20 +1200

Use 100.64.0.0/10, this is the CGNAT reserved range.I would most definitely not recommend 240.0.0.0



-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Luan Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2015 9:07 a.m.
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4

Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it?
Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...


Current thread: