nanog mailing list archives
RE: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: "Chuck Church" <chuckchurch () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:12:22 -0400
----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Ray Soucy Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 3:14 PM To: Joe Hamelin Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
As such, you typically only see it leveraged for simple services (e.g. DNS, NTP).
I've been thinking about this for NTP. Wouldn't you end up with constant corrections with NTP and Anycast? Or is the assumption your anycasted NTP hosts are all peers of each other and extremely close in time to one another? That still wouldn't address the latency differences between the different hosts. Chuck
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Max Tulyev (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rafael Possamai (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rafael Possamai (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 16)
- RE: Anycast provider for SMTP? Chuck Church (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ray Soucy (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Kurt Kraut via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ray Soucy (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ben (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rob Seastrom (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 18)