Re: Looking for information on IGP choices in dual-stack networks

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 10/Jun/15 01:04, joel jaeggli wrote:
> At one time I had datacenter interiors that had no isis support. they
> ran ospfv2 and to the extent that it was necessary in limited
> application ospfv3. the datacenter border and the backbone used ISIS for
> both adress families. routes were in general not redistributed between
IGPs.

We run Quagga on Anycast servers (DNS, NTP, TACACS+, e.t.c.) using
OSPFv2|v3, largely because Quagga's IS-IS support is terrible.

We have (restrictively) redistribute that into our IS-IS backbone, which
works great.

Wish we didn't have to do that, but it works well, and OSPF is stable in
Quagga.

Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=osk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----