nanog mailing list archives
Re: whois server features
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:55:48 -0200
So, you’re not running into a poorly-documented mystery, you’ve runafoul of one of the rotten armpits of the shub-Internet.So there's no consensus between NICs for the information they should have in whois and what search mechanisms they should provide? I guess what you're saying is that whois is just a protocol definition and nothing else?
Might not even qualify for "protocol definition", and RFC 3912 ACKs this: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3912 Rubens
Current thread:
- Fwd: whois server features shawn wilson (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features Bill Woodcock (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features shawn wilson (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features Rubens Kuhl (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features Bill Woodcock (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features shawn wilson (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features Rubens Kuhl (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features anthony kasza (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features shawn wilson (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features David Conrad (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features George Michaelson (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features shawn wilson (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features Bill Woodcock (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features Nick Hilliard (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features joel jaeggli (Jan 07)
- Re: whois server features John Levine (Jan 07)